Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffin & Sawyer Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete - Snowball. Tawker 17:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Griffin & Sawyer Miller
Non-notable actors, delete as per WP:BIO Bjelleklang -  talk 00:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not remotely notable. Two episodes of a soap. Another article about baby actors (I prefer Calton's term "very realistic props") created by someone who is either really, really fond of baby actors, or is a PR agent for baby casting agencies. When one of these kids actually acts then he may deserve an article. Fan1967 00:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Incidentially, they don't get a guernsey on the Passions page. Colon el  Tom 00:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull; CONTRIBUTIONS TALK &bull; EMAIL &bull; 01:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 03:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not old enough to have actually acted. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article asserts no notability. J I P  | Talk 09:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 12:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not important enough. Semperf 12:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, for it is not important. -- so U  m  y  a  S  ch  12:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.