Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffin Guess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. I looked at all the sources brought forward here and in the article. I found them to be either press releases from a company hiring him or in a magazine apparently published by his own management company according to the article itself. I suspect he's notable enough for an article but currently none of the sources referenced are independent of obvious COI conflicts relating to his career. Pigman ☿ 03:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Addendum: My bad. This story was independent. But I'm not changing the decision. Pigman ☿ 03:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Griffin Guess

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is full of POV and does not appear to be notable. It has a single source but the remainder of the article sounds like a bad joke. JodyBtalk 02:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Self promoting nonsense. Watchsmart (talk) 02:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NN. Doesn't appear to qualify for speedy deletion. --DAJF (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The weird thing is I can't tell if it's a horrid vanity article by the subject or a prank by someone else on the subject. Either way, how did it make it this far? Ψν Psinu 21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs major cleanup, but appears to be notable - See section that states he handles post production on about 80% of videos on MTV. Also,  Shell babelfish 22:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Shell's sources (especially the MTV work) assert notability. Also, I'm curious as to how exactly he meets a CSD criterion. &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 10:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.