Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffith University Student Law Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 21:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Griffith University Student Law Association
Delete as society vanity. Pilatus 14:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, doesn't merit an article. *drew 14:22, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delte, would hate to see every student association listed on wikipedia dr.alf 23:44, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Griffith University which already has an article on student associations although we don't need information on the Committee which is essentially transient information. Capitalistroadster 00:17, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 00:21, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Capitalistroadster's good suggestion. This AfD subpage doesn't seem to have a nomination? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:40, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, anything to remove as many lawyers as possible, even worse wanna-be lawyers. This page was originally referred to as "the most notable student association" at Griffith without any reference on the Griffith page to the actual statutory student bodies of which the SLA is just affiliated too. It is clearly a vanity webpage, these guys are just a law students club. Blargon 09:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete University associations, like this one, are not usually notable. Dottore So 10:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete University associations, like this one, are not usually notable. Dottore So 10:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete without Prejudice - The Griffith SLA is the Australian equivalent of the Harvard Law School student association, since Griffith has been rated as Australia's Leading Law School (source:Good Universities Guide 2005). As an alumni i am aware that this organisation may be noteworthy in its activities, however the article submitted to wiki is an attempt at vanity as it does not list the achievements of the association, and presents as nothing more than a group of students wanting attention (vanity). I say that this article should be deleted, and should the Student Law Association in the future manage to submit a more appropriate article to wiki demonstrating its noteworthiness, then that should must be allowed. - Does anyone on the SLA remember the Road to Nowhere?


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.