Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griggstown Quail Farm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Griggstown Quail Farm

 * – ( View AfD View log )

spam filled article on small non notable poultry farm, no salvagable content even if it was notable. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Well written and well referenced article. A whole article in the New York Times on the farm, it is as if the nominator was looking at a completely different article than the one I see. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 03:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Not only are the existing references in the article excellent, but a Google News search shows that there are many other references readily available that would show any AfD nominator willing to follow the simple procedures in WP:BEFORE Point #4 that this unusual niche business is notable. Cullen328 (talk) 06:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - references.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The needed references to establish notability were in the article at the time of nomination. -- Whpq (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.