Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grigori Chernozubov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  13:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Grigori Chernozubov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clearly fails notability guidelines, no significant coverage. No reason for this article. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military,  and Russia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: The page on Russian Wikipedia seems to be more in-depth and has more sources. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk &#124; contrib.) 10:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * There is still no notability, and one "brief" biography isn't really enough to build an entire article.
 * Kingsmasher678 (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. He has a plaque dedicated to him, and streets namead after him, should be expanded with transation from Russian version F.Alexsandr (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You seem to speak the language, I will be happy to withdraw the request if you can bring it up to snuff.
 * Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: On the one hand, there is no support for deletion. On the other hand, the keep argument is not strong. Let's hear some more thoughts on this before passing a verdict. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 00:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per comments above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Same as previous relisting comment. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep I can see multiple Google books refs in Russian. Mccapra (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. We simply have no sources. "Mentions in books," which one sporadically will encounter, amounts to very little; significant references in independent, third-party texts are required. And the one live link found takes us to a privately curated website. The Russian lemma is no help, either: It only offers a typical "listing of generals by seniority."


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.