Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grillionaire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Grillionaire

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a new term, not noted anywhere else. BankingBum 00:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) style="font-family: Andy; color: rgb(153, 51, 153); background-color: rgb(255, 204, 255);">ThePurpleMonkey(talk&bull;portal&bull;contribs) 18:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NEO, a Google search brought up nothing relevent. TJ Spyke 00:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing the policy on attribution, and as such, failing both the primary criterion on notability (as there are no sources to confirm the notability), as well as the guideline for neologisms. Kyra~(talk) 00:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Its a neogolism--Dacium 01:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. --Haemo 01:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion or evidence of notability. No sources. Fails WP:NEO. --Shirahadasha 02:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks reliable sources to support how this neologism is notable. Leebo 86 03:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - things made up in school one day. - Richardcavell 03:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to grillion. John Reaves (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find anything on Google. In response to the author's comments on the talk page: the domain "www.grillionaire.com" is for sale and therefore there is not actually such a site; Wikipedia is not "a source to people about words and their meanings," but rather an encyclopedia; Wikipedia is not "racist about trends that are happening anyway," but does include attributability as a core policy; and Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --N Shar 04:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Its an irrelevant definition and its Notability is lacking, it also fails WP:NEO. Telly addict  12:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above <span
 * Delete as an unsourced and unverified WP:NEO, see also WP:NFT.-- danntm T C 21:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This must be some kind of joke. Korranus 22:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Neologism. Daniel5127 | Talk 23:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Pile on. Dfrg.msc 23:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO. TonyTheTiger 23:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism. - Denny 06:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete trash. I've never heard "grillion" used this way (and grillion redirects to a page that mentions the word in the context of casualties). JuJube 06:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. (Also a contested PROD.) FreplySpang 23:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Indefinite and fictitious large numbers, which grillion already redirects to. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentI would agree if the word were notable as a ficticious number, but there is no evidence that it is. Pointing to the Indefinite and fictitious large numbers article is just a way to skirt the neologism rules. //BankingBum 08:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC) $
 * Comment redirects have very low notability requirements. And they're useful if anyone searches for the term. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 02:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.