Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grim Dark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Grim Dark

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparent neologism / original research. No sources provided for verification. The Anome (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as a neologism. I can't find any coverage of it in news stories or in books. Personally, I think we should not allow articles to be created in the first place without any sources being cited. This one still fails WP:N, though, in addition to not citing a single source. Tim  meh  ( review me ) 01:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. J I P  | Talk 06:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.