Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grim Humour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Fourth Dimension Records. I have copied the text of the article to the talk page of the new article for the purposes of the agreed merge. Yomangani talk 23:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Grim Humour
Nomination for deletion Defunct fanzine which claims some kind of vague subcultural notability without citing any sources. Only ~180 ghits for Fanzine and grim humour google search. Article created by single purpose account, apparently belonging to "Richo", the said editor of the defunct magazine. Bwithh 20:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I am now conditionally concurring with Ac@osr's merge solution - the condition being that independent source referencing is introduced to the Fourth Dimension article Bwithh 15:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral - had there been an article for the parent label Fourth Dimension, I would have recommended a merge as FD has released records by several notable underground artists (Thurston Moore, Merzbow, Simon Wickham-Smith & Richard Youngs, KK Null, The Gerogerigegege, Circle etc...) and FD catalogue numbers were given to the Grim Humour giveaways (which featured Sonic Youth, Ausgang, Portion Control etc...). But I'm not sure if Grim Humour is acceptable solely of itself. Seems like an odd choice given the proprietor's activities... Ac@osr 10:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Update - having considered the position, I have started an article for Fourth Dimension Records which I feel establishes notability. I would therefore suggest a Merge. Ac@osr 11:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The merge solution is fine with me as long as there is some independent source referencing too for Fourth Dimension Records too. Bwithh 15:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've added the discogs page and an independently compiled discography page which I trust stands as verfiable evidence of the releases that establish notability. Ac@osr 17:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.