Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimlore Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nordic Games (company). czar 00:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Grimlore Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I sent this to CSD-A7, it seems it was deleted, then recreated the same day. Not notable. Farmer Brown (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Last time the CSD was removed - there's discussion about deletion on the page's talk page. I would argue that this page is now more significant than before because the release date of their game is approaching. If you google "SpellForce 3", Google's infobox will find a hotlink labeled Grimlore Games, whose target page aggregates information from this page. Adding to the notability aspect - the company is the first ever in-house development studio of Nordic Games, a major publisher. - Rctngl (talk - contributions) 05:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * All of that is meaningless. What makes them notable is coverage in reliable sources.  That this is the their first inhouse studio isn't a sign of notability, as notability isn't WP:INHERITED, and being new at something isn't a sign of notability.  Quite the opposite, actually.  Farmer Brown (talk) 09:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Nordic Games (company). Primary sources suggest that Grimlore is part of Nordic Games, a more known company. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That could be a good option, I agree. Rctngl (talk - contributions) 16:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video games-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.