Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimm (role-playing game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure), there exist lots of game related articles on en-wiki, this one can exist too. Ruslik (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Grimm (role-playing game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fantasy Flight Games unless sources are brought to light indicating the notability of this topic on its own. -- Explodicle (T/C) 14:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not willing to pay the subscription fee to verify the Steve Jackson Games source, so I've struck out my !vote. -- Explodicle (T/C) 07:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Bundle and Renom I just spoke with the author on his talk page. I think the rpg articles should be bundled and renommed. Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have located three independent reviews of this RPG and have added the links to them into the article.  (At some point, if I have the time, I can add citations and expand the page, but I think that notability is now established.)  --Craw-daddy | T | 23:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a published gaming book by a notable publisher, and in none of his mass RPG AfDs has nom tendered any explanation of why these games are not notable, either in the nominations or anywhere else.  RGTraynor  23:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.