Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimsby (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Clear consensus that WP:NFF holds sway. But, note to "Jim"; thank you for your contribution. All users of the encyclopedia are encouraged to participate in these types of debates, and your comments are appreciated. You might want to consider creating an account. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Grimsby (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

per WP:NFF, filming has not yet begun and there is not exceptional coverage BOVINEBOY 2008 01:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * KEEP, plenty of sources already, more growing by the day and shooting scheduled within the next few months. You didn't attempt to nominate this page at first, it was only when I quizzed your redirection.Footballgy (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per the excellent guidance at WP:NFF which says "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date." Sources state that filming will begin summer 2014. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  03:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (chatter)  @ 10:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete It's WP:TOOSOON. Koala15 (talk) 05:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * KEEP I'm not exactly a editor here, but a reader and after reading about this in the Grimsby Telegraph I came across this page, Im not overly sure how it works and I'm not going to pretend for a second I know anything about Wikipedia's policies but I'd like to see this article remain as I'd like to keep in touch with a film that will mean a lot to our Town. Thankyou, Jim 86.21.200.23 (talk) 00:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 11:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Question. It looks like, since filming has not begun, the policy is that the article can't be in mainspace.  But could it be moved to the new /draft space, instead?  Or put into Articles For Creation process some other way.  Assuming that the movie does proceed, it would be better to credit the original editors of the article properly in the edit history, and it can be drafted and ready to go into mainspace when the criteria for mainspace are met. -- do  ncr  am  23:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Either would be fine with me. I would move it to Draft space over AFC. BOVINEBOY 2008 23:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Great. I think that would be nicer to the well-meaning creator(s) of the article. -- do  ncr  am  22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete with move (without redirect) to /Draft space, per question and discussion just above, with edit summary pointing to the /draft article. I think that's how to "vote" for the move, which technically involves a deletion of the mainspace article.  And which is nicer to persons concerned with this topic already. -- do  ncr  am  22:37, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Possibly userify, so that it can be re-uploaded when it is actually nearing release.  WP:CRYSTAL applies to pipedreams, buit this appears to have a little substance, if one can believe the article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.