Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griscuit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Griscuit

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Cookbook page. Heavily promotional, unreferenced. Contains anecdotal story. Doesn't show up on Google, so I'm assuming its just a family recipe. Didn't fit into any speedy category, and creator removed PROD, so here we are at AfD.

It looks like a mixture of advertising, how to guide, and personal essay. No sources. Pstanton (talk) 19:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete - Not notable and Wikipedia is not a cookbook. --Triwbe (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- Triwbe (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO.  WackyWace  talk to me, people 20:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Its not even a recipe for a new food, just a neologism. It just says to cook the grits, mold them to look like biscuits, let them sit, then eat them when they've hardened. Grits says the food "can be left to cool in a pan or mold" and "can be eaten cold." Edison (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Reliable sources haven't yet taken notice. First Light (talk) 04:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google only turns up random uses of the term. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.