Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly Teddy (Demonic Toys)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of toys in the Demonic Toys films. I have discounted the merge !votes, as content must comply with the verifiability policy, and this article is unsourced. If sources are found then material can be retrieved from the history as necessary. I note that the target page is itself up for deletion, but at the moment it seems likely that it will be kept. If the result is different than this, then it may become necessary to change the target of the redirect. (non-admin closure) — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 12:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Grizzly Teddy (Demonic Toys)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Zero sources. Zero out-of-universe notability. Does not met any notability guideline that I know off. Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to List of toys in the Demonic Toys films. Suggest the same treatment for all the other Demonic Toys characters.Cavarrone (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Insufficient notability or content to ever sustain an independent article. QU TalkQu 21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect And that goes for all the other "Demonic Toys" articles as well.  They have already been attempted to be changed to redirects, but there seems to be opposition to that.  Since there's no way any of these characters have enough notability on their own to warrant them having separate articles, they should all just be directed to the List of toys in the Demonic Toys films article.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect I went through a bunch of 's pages two weeks ago and had them deleted -- same thing as these current pages (i.e. characters from B-horror movies which clearly aren't notable.) It appears he's back at it again. I've posted a polite request that he stop doing this on his talk page. But, if he keeps it up, I'll report him to admin.    Joel Why?  talk  18:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of toys in the Demonic Toys films, per WP:PRESERVE, retaining verifiable information in one place. The series of Demonic Toys films are notable (Demonic Toys, Dollman vs. Demonic Toys, Puppet Master vs Demonic Toys, Demonic Toys 2). Northamerica1000(talk) 11:23, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to List of toys in the Demonic Toys films p  b  p  01:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I see two problems with the above "merge" !votes: 1/ Neither the articles on the individual characters, nor the list article, nor the articles on the Demonic Toys movies have a single reliable source (Demonic Toys 2 is the only article with references - to trailers and blogs). Hence, there is no verifiable information that can be merged. 2/ While fictional characters like Darth Vader have obvious out-of-universe notability, there is no evidence at all that any of the Demonic Toys characters have any out-of-universe notability. I don't see any reason why we need separate articles on them, or even a single list article on them, as brief plot synopses are sufficient for the individual films. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.