Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gro CRM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Gro CRM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

removed prod, but none of the concerns was fixed- fundamentally doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE jcc (tea and biscuits) 22:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks substantial coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Rentier (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 02:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello jcc,Rentier,K.e.coffman The Gro CRM page I created is being considered for deletion. I read the concerns. I am in the process of updating the page further. Any suggestions or guidance would be very helpful. Thanks! Shanescott127 (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Shanescott127 06:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- basically G11-level spam. I was going to request a speedy deletion, but I see that this has already been attemped, so it's a straight "Delete" then. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Gro CRM considered for deletion
 * I've replied on your talk page. jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Spam article on a non-notable product. Guy (Help!) 11:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:GNG, topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, therefore it is not presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. Thinker78 (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and article is WP:PROMO Hagennos (talk) 06:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.