Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groove Pigs

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 07:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Groove Pigs
Non-notable band, "groove pigs" gets 96 google hits, "groove pigs" band gets 45. Also, very POV laden and poorly written. If they are real and notable, then a severe rewrite is in order. Otherwise... this article gets the boot! --Adun 02:43, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Unencyclopaedic, boring and not notable. Delete. Agentsoo 02:23, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No claim to anything notable.  --A D Monroe III 03:20, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete bandcruft. Friday 04:56, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Allmusic.com listing but no written entry. Gamaliel 04:58, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Copyvio. Gamaliel 16:08, 16 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: The band does have a name and is famous among the underground, but that's not really sufficient. Also, this "article" has every whiff of being copyvio.  It's POV as a teenage crush.  Whether the band rates or not, we don't need this article. Geogre 15:31, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if someone replaces the copyvio of http://artists.iuma.com/IUMA/Bands/Groove_Pigs/index-0.html. Pburka 16:04, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete band vanity, no indication of notability (earthlink homepage?). And apparent copyvio. --Etacar11 02:46, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable band vanity. Fails WP:MUSIC guidleines. JamesBurns 02:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.