Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groovened Death Metal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete &mdash; Alex . Muller  07:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Groovened Death Metal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unsourced original research. Searching for 'Groovened Death Metal' on google shows absolutely no results (besides Wikipedia). Bloodredchaos (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. BuickCenturyDriver (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: I believe the term "groovened death metal" is made up and completly bogus. Dwilso  15:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete two sources currently given in the article. Neither makes mention of "Groovened Death Metal" as a term.  That plus failed google search as per nom. -Verdatum (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete neither source mentions the term "Groovened Death Metal". I'm not surprised, really... I mean... groovened?  That word alone only gets four GHits... one of which is this AfD! --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 16:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm glad someone put it up for deletion. I put it on my watchlist yesterday to do the same thing.  Totally and utterly ridiculous.  The term does not exist and if it applies to anything at all it would death 'n' roll (another article which I think is kinda ridiculous, but there is some truth to bands combining groove metal and death metal and calling it "death 'n' roll").  Anyways, delete.  Blizzard Beast  $ODIN$ 19:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - The fact is, this fails verifiability. And yes, it is completely original research. Usually this means improve, but unfortunately, this is a likely neologistic non-notable sub-extreme metal genre.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 22:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced, looks a lot like Original Research...  Milk’s Favorite Cookie    (Talk)  01:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. --Bardin (talk) 04:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Question - Death 'n' Roll is another article here on wikipedia (as I mentioned). Anyone have an opinion on that?  I thought it should be deleted before.  Blizzard Beast  $ODIN$ 17:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Label seems to be more than a neologism at least - and appears to be in somewhat widespread use, albeit in the extremely metal community. Verifiability wouldn't be a problem. What is your reasoning for feeling it should be deleted?  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 17:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This is not an appropriate place to discuss the merits of another article. Let's move this discussion to the talk page of that article. --Bardin (talk) 05:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.