Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gross Domestic Knowledge Product


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article was speedy deleted per WP:R2 by admin Cryptic, after nomination here (non-admin closure) - hako9 (talk) 08:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Gross Domestic Knowledge Product

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to be a widely used term. The only source mentioned in the article is a primary source, the non-notable organization whose employee coined this term. Daiyusha (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:NEOLOGISM. 2 (!) hits on Google Scholar. No one has picked this up. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Neologism indeed. I personally never came across this term till today. Search results aren't any promising. Non-existent citations for Umberto Sulpasso on google scholar. - hako9 (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Should still be deleted (at Draft:Gross Domestic Knowledge Product) despite its creator moving it into the draft namespace (and a bunch of others on the way). No amount of editing will make this acceptable. —Cryptic 03:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.