Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grossberg Circuit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  03:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Grossberg Circuit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be another one made up one day; no references, no context, etc, but speedy contested (not entirely properly, afaict). SamBC(talk) 21:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete When it's published in a scholarly, peer reviewed publication, we'll talk. - Richfife 22:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This is a component of Grossberg's Algorithm (article also under AfD) - the entire collection seems to be heavy original research and completely fails WP:V. Speedy contested with This is currently under review from Vanderbilt University and needs a chance before you just summarily delete it.  Having it peer-reviewed is a great first step, but thats only one of many steps to the path of verification and notability. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 23:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete To author: please see WP:OR and wait till your theorems are published prior to using wikipedia as a publisher of original thoughts, as WP:OR explicitly forbids it. Tendancer 01:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Gandalf61 10:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.