Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grosse Teub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE per WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 03:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Grosse Teub

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's no evidence that this is a notable figure of speech; being used on Facebook doesn't make it so. Previous version of article was filled with jokes*, so this article likely won't progress beyond a source of entertainment for a small number of people. ... disco spinster   talk  22:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

* e.g. "Notable opponents to "teubomology" include ((Zac Efron)), an unsuccessful candidate for ET status, and ((Anne Wilson)), a "GT turned MT" upon the discovery of her having falsified her teub-size referee." ... disco spinster   talk  22:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  —BurtAlert (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under either A7 or G3. BurtAlert (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per BurtAlert. Google no-show, apart from those impeccable sources YouTube, and porno sites, such as xhamster. Acabashi (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I found some limited evidence that the expression is used in French in highly sexualised or vulgar contexts, but that's not sufficient to make it notable. The meaning appears to be "big penis", and I have seen no evidence that this is more than just an essentially random combination of two words that make sense together. Even if Wikipedia were a dictionary we would not have articles on big penis (a redirect), big dick or long dong (both deleted). I note that the author apparently did not even try this stunt on the French Wikipedia, at least not under this title. Also, someone familiar with vulgar French should check whether the user name "Kudetat" ("queue d'état"?) violates our username policy. Hans Adler 00:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I already speedied it once as a hoax. Maybe it isn't, but I see no evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: according to Google Translate, "queue d'état" means "tail state". That can't be good... BurtAlert (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Heh.  I think it's supposed to be "coup d'etat".  ...  disco spinster   talk  02:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised that Google Translate would make such an elementary error: it's "tail of state". —Tamfang (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment It looks like I assumed too much Good Faith on this one. I knew it'd been speedied, but the newer version looked like it wasn't absolute total rubbish - so when my PROD was removed with I have removed the delete warning and will proceed to compile sources to back up the article. Please do not delete... I tried to kindly request the user add refs, and said I'd give it a few days User_talk:Kudetat. However, I do understand the above, and this edit is further evidence it is vandalism. Ah well; can't win 'em all.  Chzz  ►  16:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * delete appears to be "something we made up one day". No evidence of any wide spread usage and even if it has some credence beyond the articles creator, there is WP:NEO no third party coverage of the use of this term.Active Banana    (bananaphone  19:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete wikipedia is not a dictionary of school-based slang. MLA (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable per the above. Ealdgyth - Talk 04:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.