Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GroundWork, Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

GroundWork, Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable company. "Unecyclopaedic". It is referenced but it is way below what we should have on WP in terms of articles about companies. It is essentially spam by stealth and confers the company an unfair commercial advantage. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Reluctant keep What a worthless article - it says absolutely nothing.  But the sources look marginally qualifying for wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 01:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alan Liefting, though I wouldn't state that references are of no concern – the only source that could be considered reliable is a ZDNet-hosted blog. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.