Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groundswell (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ( X! ·  talk )  · @232  · 04:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Groundswell (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No sources establish the notability of this book. Fails WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG. Yappy2bhere (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep a google search for "Groundswell Harvard" brings up enough sources for notability.Borock (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The Harvard Business School (HBS), the Harvard Business Review (HBR), and Forrester Research are not independent sources with respect to this book. Yappy2bhere (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - the book is used by at George Washington University as an assigned textbook-, it's been used in academic reports , and it's been mentioned in two books . That's barely enough for me. Bearian (talk) 00:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * KEEP, I'm in agreement with Borock. A search on the internet with 2 different search engines Google and Dogpile bring up enough hits to indicate the "note worthiness" of the article subject. (Milestokilo (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep Worldcat shows 877 holding libraries.  . CNN lists it as one of the three best business books of 2008  calling it "their definitive guide for the business world "  and other in GNews when searched with the names of the authors  .    DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.