Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group-dynamic game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Team building. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Group-dynamic game

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sourceless since 2006 סשס Grimmchild. He/him, probably  20:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games, Education, Psychology,  and Social science.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has coverage here, here, and here. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources above are useless for establishing notability.  The first is a bank's corporate website, and the second and third give only a brief mention of the term without even bothering to define it, let alone the in-depth treatment that would be required here.  Further searching yields similarly skimpy results.  It's hard to tell if this is even really a well-defined, accepted term for something, or it's being used generically, or in different ways, or what.  If someone feels like they can scrape proper sourcing for a well-defined concept together into an article, that's one thing, but at best, blow it up and start over in that case. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 21:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. The three sources above don't show notability, as one is a bank website describing why they're using this type of game while weird grammar throughout ("Companies usually resort to this type of games"?) the next two are trivial mentions. While there's video game notability guidelines there don't seem to be any for other games, so WP:GNG is what applies, and this fails to meet that basic criteria. - Aoidh (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Team building per below. - Aoidh (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Team building. I think that's the concept that this article is reaching for, but is a much more recognized term. I would be reluctant to merge the completely unsourced information  Joyous! | Talk 15:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That's actually a really good redirect target and makes perfect sense. - Aoidh (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've been a victim of a participant in so many team-building exercises that it's very easy to recognize the description. Joyous! | Talk 22:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.