Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GroupM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

GroupM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promo. We have WPP Group, we don't need an article for each division of their company (WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES). The given sources focus on WPP, the parent co, not GroupM. At a glance, I only see GroupM coverage in unreliable sources. There's nothing really salvageable here (which isn't already in WPP Group) so should just be deleted. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I totally agree with the nominators reason for why there shouldn't be an article on this. Plus, the sources in the article are extremely trivial and don't pass WP:NCORP. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per all. -Hatchens (talk) 04:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.