Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groupoid algebra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Notability has been further corroborated after nomination, recent expansion, no delete !votes standing (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 07:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Groupoid algebra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very little content or notability. delete or at best merge to group algebra. UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - article was AfD'd 10 minutes after its creation. Give it time to evolve. Has references showing the term being used, seems notable. PamD (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per PamD. --hydrox (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, totally premature proposal. --Lambiam 19:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep − As mentioned above. Give it some time to develop. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  19:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, the concept is eminently notable (e.g. see) and there is plenty of material for its own article (e.g. see). Paul August &#9742; 20:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The works cited by Paul August establish notability.  As for "little content", the solution is to expand the article. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   --Lambiam 19:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep JRSpriggs (talk) 07:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.