Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growel's 101


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Growel's 101

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NBUILD. A local shopping mall in the western suburb of Mumbai, nothing particularly special about it. Many trivial mentions in RS, but no significant coverage. - hako9 (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per nom. Tired of these so-called notable architectural projects. Have also sent its companion The Imperial 3 to AfD, Articles for deletion/The Imperial 3. Please do weigh in, Thanks MaysinFourty (talk) 07:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing anything about this that makes it notable enough to pass any of the guidelines about notability. Since all the sources are either not reliable, trivial, or don't even have anything to do with the mall. For instance the one 3D chalk art. As a side note, someone could probably also nominate for deletion the article about the neighborhood where this is located Kandivali. Since it doesn't seem notable either. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: No, Kandivali is fine, though I agree it could be in a much better shape. It's a major area. Apologies, I'm not sure where you're from, but to give you an example it is tantamount to saying let's delete the article on Brooklyn (US) or Hampstead (UK) or Montmartre or [insert any major area in a metropolitan city]. With a population of more than half a million, it easily passes WP:GEOLAND. Best, MaysinFourty (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you have a citation for the population? Half a million isn't really that much. Especially compared to Brooklyn. Which has 2.5 million. Population doesn't really matter to WP:GEOLAND anyway though. The question is if it's legally recognized or not, and doing a quick search it doesn't seem to be. If not, then it would under point 2 of WP:GEOLAND. Mainly "considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG." Including "Examples may include subdivisions, business parks, housing developments, informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods." Otherwise, it would probably be just as well mentioned in Mumbai. Which it should be anyway, but currently isn't. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Here is the doc I looked at for population data where it's classified as Suburban District, and here the government website where it's listed as a village. If you're convinced (I am not) and feel it deserves deletion, go ahead and nominate it. I'll be watching from the sidelines. Kind regards, MaysinFourty (talk) 13:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Kandivali qualifies GEOLAND as legally recognized and populated place. Better to keep the discussion limited to nominated article. --Ab207 (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, my apologies to all! MaysinFourty (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 01:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above Spiderone  13:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.