Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grube & Hovsepian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Grube &amp; Hovsepian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've done an extensive online search, and this group does not meet any of the criteria for noteability in WP:MUSIC. Singularity42 (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

It was originally created by User:Recordjes2 as Grube and Hovsepian, where it was nominated for speedy deletion on February 4th, 2009 under Criteria A7. Recordjes2 recreated the article under the current title, where it was deleted under PROD on June 24, 2009 for failing WP:MUSIC. Recordjes2 recreated the article a third time, and I initally put it under PROD, but I was told that since it has been deleted under PROD once before, it has to come here. The other two related articles - Tim Grube and Tek-Ne - both created by Recordjes2 have been listed under PROD (Tek-Ne originally being deleted as a speedy deletion).Singularity42 (talk) 15:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment obviously not much interest here :). Before an admin re-lists this again, please note that the two related articles have now been deleted after their PRODs expired. This article was originally deleted from an expired PROD, but the author re-created it. The author has so far chosen not to comment on this review, although he was notified. This really should have been PROD'd had it not been deleted that way before. Singularity42 (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage found, No sources for claims of releases on labels. Since all their releases appear to be mp3s they haven't had multiple albums on an important label. Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.