Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grugach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Brownie (folklore). There is consensus that the article article topic is not notable and so there is consensus for the article to be deleted. Two possible redirect targets have been offered, however those suggesting Brownie (folklore) as a target cite relevant policy where as though suggesting List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters seem to be oding so more because of the current article topic. I considered relisting another week but this isn't RfD - a venue where editors regularly have these kinds of discussions - and since there is a consensus that this topic is not notable I am closing this with the redirect to Brownie. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Grugach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable D&D topic TTN (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - An obscure sub-race of elves that barely has any sources at all, primary or otherwise. The only scholarly sources discussing it are actually referring to the mythological creature from folklore, which is covered under our entry on Brownie (folklore).  If anything, this namespace should serve as a redirect to that notable topic, rather than being used to describe a non-notable fictional version.  Rorshacma (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable and Redirect to Brownie (folklore) as possible typo of alternate name.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Care to actually give a policy based reason why, exactly? Especially when, as I mentioned, there is an actual notable topic that this would be a far better redirect to?  AFD is not WP:JUSTAVOTE.  Rorshacma (talk)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Seems a consensus to merge/redirect but not yet clear to what (Brownie or List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd Edition); relist to clarity.
 * Redirect to Brownie (folklore) as a plausible misspelling of "gruagach". There is nothing worth merging in this poorly sourced piece of fancruft. Not a very active user (talk) 06:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 20:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters Policy reasons for keep !vote. WP:PRESERVE WP:ATD WP:NOTPAPER and from the five pillars I enjoy this one WP:5P5. Wm335td (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTPAPER and WP:IAR explicitly state that they are not a "free pass" to make any article ever. They are often abused as such, but only mean that one should not argue that a subject has too much content as long as it's notable. This isn't.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.