Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grupo Insud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Grupo Insud

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. Also noticing what is likely undeclared WP:COI editing coming up on related topics in WP:AFC Greenman (talk) 14:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Argentina. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT and WP:PROMO. There is enough significant independent coverage in google books and google scholar to pass WP:ORGCRIT/ WP:SIGCOV in doing a WP:BEFORE search. So I don't think a non-notable claim can be made here. That said, the article is non-encyclopedic in tone, is largely unreferenced/ unverified, and has been written by a COI editor. It needs a complete re-write with careful attention to sourcing and tone. In my opinion its best to delete and allow a non-COI editor to start over if they wish to.4meter4 (talk) 14:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.