Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grupo Salinas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 07:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Grupo Salinas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that the group of companies is separately notable to the subsidiary companies which already have articles (eg TV Azteca). Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. As I said when I deprodded the two academic books that I have cited in the article have significant coverage of the group, rather than any individual subsidiary. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Those two sources are using Grupo Salinas as case studies. I do not think this counts as "significant coverage", as defined by WP:GNG. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 12:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why not? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Have you read GNG's description of Significant Coverage? This doesn't seem to pass it. 1292simon (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have, and those books very clearly address the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content, and have more than a trivial mention of the subject. There is no "except in a case study" there. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 09:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This editor is right, 1292simon – there's no such exception. If you want to invalidate the book sources, you'll need to use a different argument. — swpb T go beyond 20:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep a Google News search turns up LOTS of coverage of Grupo Salinas and its activities. Major conglomerate. Very influential. Clearly meets guidelines for notability. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.