Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gryphon Investors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Gryphon Investors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only sources are press releases and listings. Fails WP:NCORP. Seems to have been draftified in lieu of G11, then accepted without change at AfC (shouldn't have been..) Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, strike that, was changed quite a bit - but still, doesn't seem notable. I only see reprints of press releases, blogs, listings etc. Thus failing WP:CORPDEPTH and requirement for independant sources Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Sources are either own information or routine press releases and do not establish notability. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.