Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gryzelda Konstancja Wiśniowiecka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  05:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Gryzelda Konstancja Wiśniowiecka

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

REDIRECT to husband Jeremi Wiśniowiecki's article. Subject non-notable in her own right. Nirva20 (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Poland.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and WP:TROUT the nom who failed to do WP:BEFORE and whose nomination is just a WP:ITSNOTNOTABLE assertion. The subject is notable, by the virtue of, among others, being a subject of a dedicated biography in Polish Biographical Dictionary, which is even linked from our article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, and, by the way, her article in the Polish Biographical Dictionary (translated into English) seems to be mostly about (not particularly interesting) palace intrigues/tensions. Nirva20 (talk) 14:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The article indicates nothing about subject but whose daughter, wife, and mother she was. Obviously,  I can read the tea leaves on the way this is headed but I stand by redirect proposal based on the article as it is written not how it could be written. Nirva20 (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Expand article to tell us abou the portrait, from the sources shown which don't seem to convey much. Pam  D  08:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:ANYBIO #3 per Piotrus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:ANYBIO. And Polish version of the article is lengthy. —KaliforniykaHi! 04:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously, per everything that was said Marcelus (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above. Nobody  ( talk ) 09:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep fall into WP:ANYBIO. I'm glad that Piotrus gave a speedy keep vote, even though Piotrus rarely votes to keep in AfD discussions. 1.46.91.225 (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.