Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grzegorz Borawski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Grzegorz Borawski

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Relies on online database as a source. Found no significant coverage of the subject, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Poland. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment Interesting stats from worldfootball.net played a fair bit of club and European games. It's hard to get through some of the google results for this name. It could be possible to pass GNG, but I don't have my hopes up, I'd guess this player would only have enough to be notable to Polish wiki and not the English version. Govvy (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I cannot find anything to see NBIO met. According to pl wiki, he played in GKS Katowice and such, so perhaps he meets NFOOTYBIO, if it still exists? But the article needs to be expanded from the current sub-stub, and sourced, otherwise, it's just not acceptable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per new sources below which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Thoughts on the sources provided above? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Przegląd Sportowy has a detailed interview with Borawski, but the secondary coverage is lacking. I'll look around some more, as it appears he was an important player for Katowice before the devastating injury. Jogurney (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sport.pl has a paragraph on his career as well. Jogurney (talk) 22:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Gazeta Wyborcza has an interview that appears to go into more detail (with more secondary coverage) but it's paywalled so I can only see the first 3 paragraphs. I'm leaning towards !weak keep now. Jogurney (talk) 22:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep - I think the article narrowly passes WP:GNG with some secondary coverage in a couple of in-depth interviews as well as a batch of lower-quality coverage. He was a regular starter for GKS in the Polish top division for five seasons, and a Polish cup-winner in the first season with GKS. Some of the coverage focuses heavily on his unusually nasty injury, but I think there's sustained interest as all of these articles are post-retirment. Jogurney (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Barely passes notability. per Jogurney this interview contains more coverage about him as I was able to read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JunitaWorker (talk • contribs) 18:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Jogurney findings. Govvy (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep -, , Per above. Besides the sources above, I found and m among other sources. Definitely has offline sources, having clearly been topic of interest in Polish football. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. A mention in passing in an article about name Grzegorz in a minor Polish football portal, and some video report - I think I'll stick with my vote above. PS. That said, an interview in Wyborcza calling him "one of the best players of GKS in the 90s" counts for something (and for the record, I have access to the full version of this article) - but I think it's still pretty borderline. I'll change my vote to abstain for now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per new sources given. The person who loves reading (talk) 21:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as per new sources. Suonii180 (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep new sources seem sufficient Karnataka (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.