Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guadalajara: The Experience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Guadalajara: The Experience

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod contested on the grounds that this movie is available for purchase. However, it never got a reliable critic's attention and therefore fails our inclusion guidelines for movies. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 13:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this film fails WP:NF in every way.--90.0.130.131 (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - This film has 5 star customer ratings on two websites seen at the films Amazon page and at its Lulu page. I think you all should give it a break. -- 75.170.60.176 (talk) 19:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's based on two unidentified Amazon customers. Way short of our guidelines for source reliability. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I believe that this page is a good contribution to Wikipedia. If someone sees this film for sale and wants to know about it, it is great to have on here. I understand that this "needs" a reliable critic's attention, but I strongly disagree. All customer ratings on the sites listed by 75.170.60.176 are the best rating applicable. I believe the rules should bend a little for this article. BurnzBoy2 blah blah blah 20:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON without prejudice toward recreation if/when this recent film gets coverage to meet WP:NF. I would not be adverse to a userfication to author User:Burnzboy2 in the meanwhile with our thanks, as the article does indeed need work to be brought into line with guideline, and the author can do this in a workspace and seek input and advice from seasoned contributors, prior to any possible return to mainspace. And to Burnzboy2, with respects, please review requiremets at WP:NF and WP:GNG to see that customer ratings on Amazon or a self-published article at Lulu are simply not enough.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Userfication - I will just move this to a subpage of my user page until it meets the requirements. Thank you for all your help. Bu<b style="color:#f63">r</b><b style="color:#f60">n</b><b style="color:#f30">zB</b><b style="color:#f00">oy</b><b style="color:#c30">2</b>blah blah blah 02:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes... I see it at User:Burnzboy2/Guadalajara. Upon the closing of this discussion, the edit history will be moved there if requested. And in the meanwhile, take a look at User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help getting this article straightened out everyone. <b style="color:#f90">Bu</b><b style="color:#f63">r</b><b style="color:#f60">n</b><b style="color:#f30">zB</b><b style="color:#f00">oy</b><b style="color:#c30">2</b>blah blah blah 03:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.