Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guadalupe Urbina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 00:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Guadalupe Urbina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Urbina Stats )

It's seems like can't pass the BIO Feloniii (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Feloniii
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Costa Rica-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article has references from La Nacíon, The Tico Times and Latin American Music Review. The nominator has not explained why these sources are not enough to establish notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 15:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per WP:BASIC "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Tico Times calls her "Queen of Folk: Guadalupe Urbina." There is a documentary about her life and work. The article cites multiple RS. She is clearly notable, just one of three malformed AfDs against notable women filed by (the other two are Columbia professor Keren Bergman and Costa Rican actress Thelma Darkings. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - The nominator seems to not to have read the article, or done a proper WP:BEFORE. There are sufficient RS to establish notability. Maybe a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT Netherzone (talk) 15:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep has significant coverage in Spanish language reliable sources as described in this discussion so passsing WP:Basic in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep As the subject of a documentary about her life this nomination has no chance of passing. PainProf (talk) 00:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Clearly has independant coverage. Uncertain why nom put this article up for AfD. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, for her coverage in Spanish language sources and for the documentary film. Alex-h (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.