Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GuardNOW


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G11, entirely promotional; PR web is not an acceptable source for notability   DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

GuardNOW

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of the sources that the article relies are affiliated with the subject of the article, looks like an advertisement, does not meet WP:CORP and WP:GNG, non-notable Mediran  talk 00:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Does this article meet the CSD G11? If it does, then I'll put the tag on the article. Interlude 65  01:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - @Interlude 65 - Yes, details such as "Each security guard is outfitted with a distinct uniform" and their mission statement are always unnecessary. If you don't mind, I have tagged the article. Google News found one press release here which mentions a former law enforcement officer started the company, but aside from this, I haven't found anything else despite adding "company" and "2010". SwisterTwister   talk  01:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, SwisterTwister. I was trying to be extra cautious and make sure this article actually does meet CSD G11 or if it does not. Interlude 65  01:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Little coverage of the subject by secondary sources outside of press releases. The subject does not meet the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for organisations.-- xanchester  (t)  01:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.