Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian Angel (Novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 17:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Guardian Angel (Novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD deleted, as they usually are, by page creator with no explanation. Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:CRYSTAL. Some information could potentially be smerged to CHERUB or Robert Muchamore, per point 5 of WP:CRYSTAL. Yunshui (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * All information on this Article has been approved by the author of the book on the official CHERUB website, therefore this article should not be deleted. Click this link to see the website: http://www.cherubcampus.com/book14.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 555legoboy555 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately the author's own site tends not to be a reliable source (see WP:PRIMARY). Wikipedia does not tend to list books (or albums, artworks, films, plays, concertss etc.) in advance of their creation, unless it can be demonstrated that their imminent release has generated sufficient coverage (in the media, academic community or literature) - this is the gist of WP:CRYSTAL. Yunshui (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per interesting, reliable and important upcoming article and just common sense. Rhain1999 (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. It can be recreated when it is actually published, if it is actually published, under the title under which it is published. Mangoe (talk) 14:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - the only source is unreliable, being the book's publisher. So, no sources usable, fails WP:V. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication of coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, at least not yet. --Odie5533 (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.