Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian Monthly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Guardian Media Group. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Guardian Monthly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an 11 year old article about a magazine that only lasted for 8 months from 2006 to 2007. It has no references to establish notability, and its official website no longer exists (it just redirects to the Guardian's home page). – numbermaniac  05:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  13:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep It didn't last, but the industry trade publications discussed it when it was around. At a minimum, the content could be preserved by merging to, e.g., Guardian Media Group. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Guardian Media Group § History as per WP:ATD-M. The suggested merge target only has a link in the See also section, so merging will make that article more complete, and better. North America1000 11:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  14:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge per Northamerica1000. I don't think a short-lived magazine without any significant impact can have its own article as the article is unlikely to be expanded. Content can be merged to another article, but omit the quote (a simple statement that it had been cancelled would suffice). Hzh (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.