Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian angel (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Guardian angel (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable video game to be released. Creator of the article has a name that implies affiliation with the creator of the game. No sources. No related results on Google. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed, the game is not notable enough to merit a page. Indeed on the page itself it says, 'Not much info has been released.' No references are given to third party sources and nothing turns up on a Google search. I would suggest deleting it for now and recreating the article if, as we get closer to 2016, more information is released thereby increasing its notability and addressing the other concerns which have been made. Nyctimene (talk) 10:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - It is also worth mentioning that no proper article links to the page and it links to no other article. This, coupled with the fact that there are no Google hits for the game, make it incredibly unlikely anyone would search for the page. Nyctimene (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete IMHO "Currently in development" + "Not much info has been released" = WP:TOOSOON. BTW There are some platforming flash game out there that is also called Guardian Angel(s) apparently, and that is just plain NN.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 14:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.   野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 14:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete I think "TOOSOON" is generous. This article is about something that not only doesn't exist and has no proof it ever WILL exist, much less be notable enough for an article. EBY (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.