Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 13: The River of Wind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect/Merge to Guardians of Ga'Hoole. Keilana | Parlez ici 03:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Guardians of Ga&

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. This book does not meet the criteria for notability of books - no sales data, it's not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works, not been adapted into a film, etc. Pairadox (talk) 23:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - major series in it's field or genre. Highly popular - this is the latest entry in the established series. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  10:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - That's the entire series, which has it's own article. Nothing in the article indicates this single book is notable in it's own right. Pairadox (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 15:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect to Guardians of Ga'Hoole, doesn't seem to be independently notable although part of a notable series. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Some relevant arguments from a similar issue in the past: Articles for deletion/Running on Empty (Hardy Boys novel) -- Auto (talk / contribs) 03:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect: Per TenPoundHammer and WP:BK.  is referring to an AFD that is over 10 months old when WP:BK was not an accepted guideline.  Now the notability is pretty clearly not there.  —Wknight94 (talk) 13:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.