Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guatemala-India relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that this has been taken to DRV for the NAC. I have reviewed the close and given the sources provided by NA1000 and the traction that they gained I confirm that the close was the same as mine would have been as a prelude to closing the DRV. Spartaz Humbug! 06:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Guatemala-India relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. offering visa free travel or incidents of illegal migration (unless massive) do not add to notability. and a competing spice trade rather than trade between countries is hardly notable. bilateral trade of $93 million is tiny, considering Guatemala has a GDP of $47 billion and India, $1.8 trillion LibStar (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: An embassy, minor trade and so on, and common membership in multinational organizations do not add up to "bilateral relations". הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 03:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: Bilateral visits and specially India-SICA are important. --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * the article makes no reference to bilateral visits please provide sources. LibStar (talk) 02:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I saw somewhere in India.gov website, but, tight now, I can find this --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep – The topic is notable and passes WP:GNG. Source examples include (some are non-English):, , , , , , , , , , . There are enough sources that consist of significant coverage from which to base a Wikipedia article. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep per Northamerica1000. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as an important encylopedic topic and under the gazzeeteer mandate of the WP:5P. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin editor has recycled this argument many a time, without addressing the specifics of the AfD in question. LibStar (talk) 01:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.