Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guelph Daredevils


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Guelph Daredevils

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has claims of importance (professional team), but gsearch not turning up existence let alone notability. Zero ghits, zero gnews hits, not listed on SOCA's page at canadacricket.com. Either wishful thinking or not notable. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  23:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as unverifiable. The article provides one reference which actually doesn't have any information about a team named "Guelph Daredevil".  As indicated by the nominator, a search for the team name in quotes literally turns up no results in Google News, and only this wikipedia article in the Google Web search. -- Whpq (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The claim that this is a "professional cricket team" is very difficult to believe for a local league team in a country where even the top level teams are not professional. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per my comment above. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A hoax. Iowateen (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.