Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guenther Wachsmuth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Guenther Wachsmuth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet basic WP:PERSON notability guidelines as Wachsmuth never received any awards or recognition outside of the Anthroposophical Society which is itself an esoteric and fringe group. Does not meet WP:ACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR guidelines as multiple independent secondary or tertiary sources outside of the anthroposophical movement do not cite or note his work. Article has only 1 source, and it is a fringe publication by an anthroposophist admirer. This gentleman would be notable on a Anthroposophy-specific wiki, but that is not what this is. This is the english wikipedia and Guenther Wachsmuth did not live a notable enough life or die a notable enough death to have his own article. -- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 06:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Interesting individual but not featured in any reliable sources so delete is the correct thing to do per policy. Skeptic from Britain (talk) 07:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 02:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 02:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 02:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 02:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 02:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Sources just do not hold up notability. Hyperbolick (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.