Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guest Keen Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article passes WP:NCORP as highlighted in the discussion (non-admin closure) Run n Fly (talk) 15:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Guest Keen Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ORG. There are no sources present in the article. Didn't find anything on google books, news or regular search. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I have cited a 20-page book chapter about the subject in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - the company, now known as GKW Limited, is listed on the National Stock Exchange of India according to Reuters, which doesn't necessarily point to notability, but suggests there is likely independent coverage (WP:LISTED). In a cursory search I found some news coverage under its new name: "GKW arm to come under Graphite fold" (Telegraph India); "GKW shares jump six-fold in 2 weeks" (Hindustan Times); "GKW inks pact with Western India Forgings" (Business Line); and "Phoenix Mills buys land from GKW, eyes bigger prize ahead" (Mint). Aranya (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Badly fails WP:GNG. Non-notable. --Wildhorse3 (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * And what about the sources found by me and by Aranya? Why don't you consider them to give a pass of the general notability guideline? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The book reference by Phil Bridger and other book references in addition to the high probability of analyst coverage during its long years quoted on the stock exchange is more than enough to meet NCORP requirements. There is some concern of the accuracy and paucity of the article though. For example this book, "The Role and Impact of Multinationals" suggests the company was set up as a private company in 1931 under the name "Henry William India" (not mentioned in the article) and other references suggest that a minority stake was acquired by a British company, GKN, which is also not mentioned.  HighKing++ 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.