Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guide to Warez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was article sent to Copyright problems. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Guide to Warez
Not an encyclopedia article. The subject is, I presume, properly dealt with in warez and related articles. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 20:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Should be linked to warez as well needs tonnes of editting. Just because you don't agree with warez doesn't mean you should stop other people from reading about how one "does warez". Keep --129.97.84.62 20:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete - definitely not an encyclopedia article, written in wrong tone. Drdisque 20:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, written in first person, POV, unencyclopedic. Rhobite 21:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic. Edgar181 21:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio, published in 2600 Hacker Quarterly Summer 2004. Off to mark it as such. FreplySpang (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a copyvio, per freplyspang. --אריאל יהודה 00:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.