Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guided Functional Peer Support


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Guided Functional Peer Support

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Little indication of notability. In fact, looks like one author's pet project. Orphaned for a decade. Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychiatry and Finland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Leaning delete. Google Scholar shows very few hits, mostly bachelor's or master's theses and a book that looks to be self-published (I Sing Support For You: A Self Help Book With Music for Parents and Caregivers of Children Affected by Trauma or Toxic Stress). The more scholarly sources are very few, by a rather small group of authors and look to only mention the model in passing.
 * Looks to only mention the model in a footnote.
 * Mentions the model, but does not define it or discuss it in detail.
 * Referenced in one of the above. I don't have online access to quickly check whether this mentions the model at all, but I'll take a look whether we have physical copy in the stacks and will report back.
 * For non-scholarly sources, there appear to be a bunch of Google hits for various kulttuuripaja things (which, I think, are the activity related to the model), but the name is so generic (lit. 'culture workshop') I doubt we can draw any kind of equivalence or claim that all things discussing kulttuuripajas are necessarily related to the GFP model. Independent sources look to be scarce. For example this STT text is actually an non-independent press release. There's something about an award, but I cant figure out how big of a deal it is.
 * I'll also note that the original creator's username indicates it's a WP:ROLEACCOUNT (contrast to Sosped-säätiö). That makes this all feel somewhat promotional. -Ljleppan (talk) 08:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I found a copy of Ikävalko & Kurki (2014), it appears wholly unrelated. Based on what I've seen, absent someone identifying some good independent sourcing, I'll go with delete. Ljleppan (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although the award provides a shred of notability, the article goes off topic and does not talk about the subject itself. The news report barely mentions the article's subject, only doing so in a paragraph. Tarantula TM  (speak with me) (my legacy) 04:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.