Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guided self service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Guided self service

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article lacks content and reasonable notability Calltech 19:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Reluctant delete, but I could be persuaded otherwise if the article improves.Ezratrumpet 01:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable, little content is no reason to delete. Smmurphy(Talk) 04:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Guided Self Service
 * weak delete per it has the hits, but fails sourcing the_undertow talk 08:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the very definition of an unneeded article. Lancaster D Mistletoe 11:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be WP:OR lacking any sources to the contrary, and nothing to establish notability.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.