Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guido (slang)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 17:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Guido (slang)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article cites no sources. Tagged with verify tag since July. Not in compliance with WP:V or WP:NOR. Dean Wormer 03:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Not only is it a real thing, it's also sourceable:, , , . Wl219 04:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very notable, and sourced as shown. Speaking as a part Guido, I object to deletion of myself. • Lawrence Cohen  05:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Part of the culture of the NE US, and with the sources above, verifiable.   Acroterion  (talk)  19:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable.  Article needs better sourcing, more encyclopedic tone, and should follow any guidelines we have for ethnic slurs. Wikidemo 04:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable, even though it's offensive. WP is for adults, not to be censored for randomly. Sourceable per Wl219. Bearian 01:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please assume good faith; I don't think the nominator wanted to delete the article because it is offensive or because he wants to censor Wikipedia. He cited verifiability and original research concerns.  Melsaran  (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, can apparently be sourced (see Wl219's comment), may need some purging though (contains a lot of OR).  Melsaran  (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.