Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guido Caldarelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 01:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Guido Caldarelli

 * — (View AfD)

Deleted via WP:PROD, contested and restored. Normally I leave AfD nomination of contested PRODs up to the original PROD nominator, but as that was an anon in this case, and probably won't receive a message, I'm breaking my usual rule and doing a procedural nomination.

The PROD justification was "Likely failure of WP:BIO and WP:AUTO". Abstain for now. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, Mr. Caldarelli should easily pass WP:PROF. My problem is that the article itself is pretty thin and someone should do some work on it. Alf photoman 16:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I am familiar with Dr Caldarelli's work.  He meets Wikipedia:Notability (academics) criteria 2, 3 and 5.  He has contributed to scale-free networks, assortative mixing, Complex Networks and the stable marriage problem.  Oxford University Press commissioned him to write a definitve guide to scale free networks, which is now in press. Thomas Fink 19:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Like Caldarelli, Thomas Fink is a self-promoter. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. As to Wikipedia:Notability (academics) criteria 2, 3 and 5. Bernhard Kenner 12:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Less than 50 edits, mostly to stuff related to Thomas Fink for some reason. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. As to Wikipedia:Notability (academics). The content (and the lenght) of the page is appropriate to the page subject ruvido 12:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Single-purpose account. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete self-promotion. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.