Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guild (permaculture)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to permaculture. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 22:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Guild (permaculture)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is an awkward stub article. The words as used form jargon phrases becoming somewhat impenetrable to the non topic-expert. The article title, if the article is deemed to be valid here, should probably be changed to permaculture guild since it appears misnamed, but it has no references and thus appears to be Original Research, or possibly an attempt to establish the terms by placing it in an encyclopaedia. So I am proposing it for discussed deletion on the basis that a PROD doesn't seem fair to it, and AfD will give it a substantial chance of discussion and perhaps enhancement. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to permaculture. Seems to be a legitimate topic, per this search, but there's insufficient information here to justify a separate article. Pburka (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment While I understand the logic of a redirect, redirecting an article of this name is not valid because it is not a topic anyone would look for. If such a redirect is appropriate it may be created today without conflicting with this article by creating it at Permaculture guild. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe that this article has the correct name already. The term isn't "permaculture guild", it's just "guild", but it has a specific meaning in the field of permaculture. Of course, the other advantage of redirecting is that it can be done boldly, without clogging up AfD. Pburka (talk) 20:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then the article has the alleged term incorrectly emboldened within it. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's fixed easily enough :) Pburka (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to permaculture. The subject is already covered in permaculture. 21:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to permaculture. If this topic should outgrow permaculture, we can always split it again. As it stands, the article is very weak and it appears unlikely to become substantial any time soon, if ever.  Dethlock99 (talk) 04:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect' per above. build the single sentence up, and eventually it will be capable of standing on its own. but lets see the material first, then split it off. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.