Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilds of Ankh-Morpork


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Guilds of Ankh-Morpork

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable collection of in-universe fictional minutia. TTN (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I love Discworld but like most fiction most of its elements are not encyclopedic. Readers are better served going to https://discworld.fandom.com/wiki/Guilds_of_Ankh-Morpork anyway. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Piotrus.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. as a major fictional element of a famous fiction. It would be too much to make separate aticles on each--this aiso a combination article, as it should be, and therefore justified. But the article i uneven, and need improvment by reducing thedetail of the more expansive sections--any that arejustifiedby their role should have separate articles, as I think one of them does.  DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That's supported by nothing. Plot information can be kept to a minimum simply by summarizing it to the barest possible extent while retaining necessary context or simply not including it. Your criteria for inclusion is completely subjective, allowing for literally any fictional minutia to be catalogued. TTN (talk) 01:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing here has any importance outside the books mentioned. There is not broad and well based coverage enough to justify this article. This is not Wikia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Completely in-universe plot summaries, sourced to nothing but the Discworld books. Searching for additional sources also only results in various official Discworld books, with no independent sources discussing the concept in-depth.  Rorshacma (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.